Archive for October, 2009

Why I move

Saturday, October 31st, 2009

I have a moving complex. It’s kind of odd. Every six months or so, I decide that I absolutely have to move apartments, and I start combing craigslist for a better option than the one I’ve got. I’m sure a psychologist would have a field day with this compulsive behaviour. In the last four and a half years, I’ve actually moved seven times. Yes. Seven.

A friend once advised me that every time I feel this way, I should just move some furniture around. And honestly, it does work. But only for a month or two. (In September, we shifted my desk into the bedroom and got a new dining room table! The novelty just wore off.)

So a few weeks ago I decided it was time again. I targeted a few perfect neighbourhoods and warned P that our lease was up in December. He responded by ignoring me completely. P remembers well the ordeal of our last move.

But I persisted, searching for the perfect apartment – larger and less expensive than our own, not to mention close to good running trails and quiet, scenic places to cycle. And of course there must be an independent coffee shop that makes killer americanos nearby. That’s a no-brainer.

Well, I still haven’t found it. And this morning, something funny happened. I wandered into my living room in my pyjamas, Saturday Globe in hand, and stopped at the sight of the most beautiful morning outside my window. The sun was warming Lost Lagoon and the now leafless trees, and the rainclouds were lifting over Cypress Mountain, and everything was purple and blue and gold and lovely.

And it was one of those rare moments when I thought, really, why move? I think it’s called here-and-how-happy. That’s what I’m calling it, anyway.

My two cents on writing courses

Sunday, October 25th, 2009

Yesterday I attended a fantastic panel discussion about teaching creative writing. It was part of the the Vancouver International Writers Festival, and the panelists were Edmundo Paz-Soldan, Kathryn Kuitenbrouer, and Alistair Macleod. All were asked to discuss whether teaching creative writing helped or hindered their own work – a topic of particular interest to this creative writing teacher. (As an aside, did you know that the average income for a Canadian professional writer is $12,000 a year? Seriously. No wonder teaching gigs are so hard to come by.)

First let me say that I could have listened to Alistair Macleod read for hours and hours. He has the most wonderful voice. It’s been years since I read No Great Mischief and Island, but I now plan to revisit them. I wonder if he did an audio book. Must investigate…

Anyway. The discussion was delightful for reasons other than Macleod’s voice. Kuitenbrouer was hilarious and all panelists so insightful. All  teach or have taught at North American universities, and they chatted about finding time to write, mentoring needy writers who want to vent about ex-boyfriends, and whether writing programs produce cookie-cutter authors (the latter of which could be a long blog post in itself. I’ll save it for another time).

But. Near the end someone asked whether writers can be taught, or whether they’re simply born. Man. If I had a nickel for every time someone said to me, “Why are you going to university for creative writing? You can’t learn to be a writer. You either have it or you don’t,” well, I might be about 50 cents richer. But still. I was happy to hear the panelists echo my sentiment on the topic – that talent might be born, but courses can be key to helping you hone the skills and techniques you need to succeed.

To echo and build on Macleod’s point, it’s like a person being born with the talent to be a great soccer player. Say she has the natural fitness, the body, and (very importantly) the spirit and drive to be a wicked striker. Fine. But she still doesn’t know the rules unless she’s taught. She can still benefit from a coach who shows her various techniques and best ways to practice.

And then there’s the feedback! What writer wouldn’t benefit from a roomful of thoughtful people discussing her work and how they understood it as objective readers? I am so grateful for the years I spent (and still spend) in those rooms.

So. My point? I’m a big fan of writing programs. Attend them, I say! Support them! Fund them if you can!

And on that note, I’m going to go find my copy of No Great Mischief. Remember the part where they’re walking across the winter sea ice? Man. Chills.

The twitter dilemma

Monday, October 19th, 2009

I am in a quandary. To tweet or not to tweet? I’ve only been on Twitter for about ten days, and I’m thinking of jumping ship.  Now, don’t get me wrong. Twitter certainly has its benefits. I mean, I found out about the Balloon Boy in no time flat. And thank god for that, really.

But I have a few good reasons for pondering pulling a Miley Cyrus. First, I already spend way too much time checking email and Facebook and all my favourite food blogs every time I need a break from writing (i.e. every 15 minutes or so). Twitter is another time suck.

Second, frankly, Twitter kind of kills my self-esteem. Seriously. A friend once told me that the reason she avoids Facebook is because it makes her think that everyone is having way more fun than she is. Twitter is kind of like that for me. I’ll check it at 10 am only to find that while I’ve been sipping tea in my pyjamas, other people have won literary awards, interviewed celebrities, mentored entire high schools, and come up with way wittier things to say in 140 characters than I have in my last hour of writing. And then, instead of using that as motivation to work, I end up getting immersed in their experiences until next thing I know it’s noon and my tea’s cold and I’m still in my pyjamas.

Anyway. I’m just pondering it for now. And if I do end up going through with The Deletion, rest assured I will not compose a really bad rap to explain my motives. An opera, perhaps. Or a sea shanty. But not a rap.

All a-twitter

Tuesday, October 13th, 2009

I’ve decided to give Twitter a try. I’ve put this off for ages, so I’m a little nervous now that I’ve signed up. Not quite sure what I’m going to report on. But if you’d like to follow along and listen to my 140-character musings on, say, the man in my building who walks around with a budgie on his head, then you can find me here.

Catching Fire

Monday, October 12th, 2009

So I finally got down to reading Catching Fire, the oh-so-long awaited sequel to The Hunger Games, the YA novel that rocked my little world last winter. Catching Fire sat on my desk for a few weeks, tempting me with its gorgeous cover and action-packed innards. But I forced myself to hold off until I’d made it through Slaughterhouse Five, which was high on my list of books I feel I really should have read by now. Including Anna Karenina and The Grapes of Wrath and pretty well everything by James Joyce. The gaps in my literary knowledge are roughly the size of crop circles.

booknewshungergames2newAnyway, after finally, triumphantly, tossing Vonnegut aside, I snatched up Catching Fire and happily dove back into that world. Man. This series is completely addictive. It’s going to make a stunning movie – so visually detailed and charged with plot. I love the feeling of having to stop my eyes from leaping to the next page, so eager to find out what happens next.

I won’t give away a thing. I’ll just say that Catching Fire has everything a fan of The Hunger Games could ask for: more cliffhanger chapter endings, more smart dialogue, more about the politics of Panem, and of course, more of the Katniss-Peeta-Gale love triangle. And although I’ve changed my mind a few times now, I’m currently a card-carrying member of Team Peeta. Just sayin’.

Five glowing stars for Suzanne Collins!